Benefit cap has 'couple penalty'
Filed under: News
The controversial £26,000 limit on the total amount of benefits claimed by any household was described as "incoherent" by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) in an analysis which warned of undesirable consequences.
About 67,000 households across Britain are expected to lose an average of £83 each week in benefits when the cap - set at £350 a week for childless single people and £500 for others - is implemented in 2013/14, said the IFS.
The move will save £290 million a year from the Government's £18 billion welfare bill, but critics warn it will drive larger families into cheaper accommodation and make areas of cities such as London unaffordable for those claiming benefits.
A paper by IFS research economist Robert Joyce said it would hit all couples with four children and no private income who pay rent of £127 a week or more - a "plausible" level for privately-rented homes or social housing tenants in London. Smaller families in high-rent areas could also be hit, he said.
The Government believes that the change will encourage families to move to cheaper homes or take up paid work. But Mr Joyce noted that it could also reduce fertility rates and encourage partners to live separately.
Mr Joyce wrote that a "possible behavioural impact is for fewer people to cohabit, since the benefits cap is to apply at the household level, and hence living apart could split benefits across households and mean that neither is subject to a cap".
He added: "This 'couple penalty' is presumably something the Government would not be keen on, as it has said that it wishes to reduce couple penalties in the tax and benefit system."
Fertility rates could also drop, because the cap "will effectively reduce state financial support for some large families", wrote Mr Joyce, adding: "If this were the main intended impact, though, one would expect to see the policy affecting only new claimants of child-contingent benefits."