Cow close upDavid Cheskin/PA Archive/Press Association Images

The New Covent Garden Food company is licking its wounds today, after getting a bashing over a botched competition on its packs. The 'win a farm' competition offered a top prize of £500,000 with which to buy a farm and start a new life.

It's an appealing notion, and one that garnered 267,000 entries in desperate pursuit of the rural idyll. The trouble was that the way they ran the competition meant no-one won.

The competition

The company printed up promotional packs with a unique code on each, but although 267,000 of these codes were entered into the site, none of them was the winner. The owner of that lucky pack must have chucked it out without bothering. There was no mechanism in place to deal with this situation, so there was simply no top prize awarded.

The company admitted it on Facebook, and fans of the page were decidedly unimpressed. Those commenting pointed out that a draw would have seemed more fair, that they could have had a fall-back in place, allowing them to pick another code. Others felt cheated, and some even asked whether the whole promotion was a scam.


Defence

Nigel Parrott, Group Marketing Director at New Covent Garden Soup Co told AOL Money: "We appreciate that people are disappointed that the 'win a farm' prize wasn't won, we are just as disappointed and we take the feelings and comments of our customers very seriously. We had 267,000 entries to the competition, had all packs been entered, someone would definitely have won."

Annie Swift, chief executive of the Institute of Promotional Marketing said there was nothing wrong with the competition itself, saying: "The IPM looked at this promotion before it went live, as we do with thousands of these promotions every year; there was nothing wrong with the terms and conditions. It was legal and it followed the CAP Code, the rules which cover promotions like this."

Disaster

However, the promotion has left a nasty taste in the mouth for many consumers. What started out as a competition costing the company millions of pounds in order to generate good publicity has ended in a sorry farce. Parrott said: "We are now reviewing how future promotions should be run and are taking these comments into consideration."

The Facebook commentators, meanwhile, continue to demand that the company finds a way to award the prize.

But what do you think? Does it seem fair to you? What should the company do now? Let us know in the comments.


More stories