Disabled 'paying more than bankers'
Filed under: Debt
The Government is charging disabled people more than bankers for its austerity programme, Labour has claimed.Filed under: Debt
The Government is charging disabled people more than bankers for its austerity programme, Labour has claimed.
Voters 'think austerity has failed'
Families '£891 per year worse off'
Work Programme is failing, say MPs
PM 'did not raise Google tax row'
Grayling defends legal aid reforms
'No alternative' to Royal Mail plan
Economic plan working, says Osborne
'Vulnerable stereotype' challenged
Cable warns on 'reckless' EU exit
Warning over foreign farm workers
'Bedroom tax' challenge in court
Bid to put brake on Motorway fuel costs
We encourage lively discussion at AOL. Please be aware when you leave a comment your user name, screen name and photo may be displayed with your comment, visible to everyone on the Internet. If you think a comment is inappropriate, you may click to report it to our monitors for review.
Not an AOL or AIM member? Register for a free account.
Something definitly wrong here, instead of a Government assisting, they seem HELL BENT on pulling the carpet from beneath the vulnerable. If everyone writes or emails every MP, then something must prevail.
The increasement of people coming into the UK & the London area has in itself fueled the issue also the Government has not assisted in preventing the influx.
I remember visiting Remploy back in the 60s as a student Nurse then it was a very successful business selling what it made, many of the workers were severely disabled.
I dare say today it could be made a very successful business if these Tory B******* do not close it all down.
The disabled need a work place where they can be successfully employed, and feel comfortable. otherwise if Remploy closes it just means a lot more people on the scrap heap and I cant see many businesses giving the disabled a chance.
One would like to believe that this is the law of unexpected consequences in action. If it isn't and government knew of it, then it is shameful. However Remploy does need to stand on it's own two feet. It can, with a good owner and management. Feel sure that Mr Byrne's comments will be dealt with.
June 21 2012 at 8:06 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Reply"Half of your front bench have been going around saying we are socially cleansing London because we are being too fierce on housing benefits."
Would the housing benefits bill be spiralling out of control if Margaret Thatcher's government hadn't taken social housing rents up to the level of the private sector in an attempt to make running that same social housing attractive to the private sector?
wake up people i'll say it again if it benefits the people it will not be tolerated by these people, just look at your gas water electric and north sea oil to name afew all flogged off to their pals in the city. then again i suppose you get what you vote for at 75 i have seen it all before i regret to say they are all chancers even the wonderful tony blair. we are still living in the 16th century here
June 21 2012 at 7:09 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplySocialism encourages laziness.
Get rid of ALL benefits AND the NHS and make people work for their so called 'benefit entitlements'
Instead of consistantly complaining (through jealousy) of people who are high earners, go start your own businesses or co-operatives and become high earners yourselves!
Stop expecting others to fund your non-working benefits!
The last one who had a similar idea was called Stalin, and see what he made out of it!
June 21 2012 at 6:55 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyPresumably those individuals too disabled to work - yes there are some genuine people out there - should invest in a cap and familiarise themselves with the local street corner?
June 21 2012 at 7:13 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyOf course the disabled are being targetted it is soft target time once again. I just hope not too many of them are also pensioners. Otherwise they are really going to get it in the neck!
June 21 2012 at 6:45 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyI am a disabled pensioner,disabled since 1980 but did not claim DLA ever, and pensioned over the last 7 years. Only on the subject of daily transport and home help there is a problem, financial there is not.OK it's not a rich living,it's not eaten out every day or holiday's several times a year but generally it's just OK. And I come by with gardening and reading.
June 21 2012 at 7:00 AM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyI can make claims but I choose not to do so for now. Perhaps one day when I absolutely cannot fend for myself, then I will complete the paperwork and see what happens.
June 21 2012 at 8:09 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIDS is loving wrecking the wefare state , Liam Brynn is right , Cameron needs to take into consideration that IDS is constantly making this Tory Goverment unelectable , I didnt say Coalition cause LibDems are finished already and good rissens Clegg and Co. To attack the sick poor and Elderly and punish those who work is a discrace. Lansley , IDS , and Osborne are the worst trio in living memory and are ruining our Country, They just havnt got it !!!! They havnt a clue what they are doing. Its time for a reshuffle and soon.
June 21 2012 at 5:53 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyThis change in the application of benefits is more to do with ensuring that money goes to the right people for the correct reasons.
If claims have been exaggerated or are a total fraud then nobody wants this. However paying a fair living sum to those who really are in need is the aspiration of society and government for decades.
That hasn't changed surely?
Don't have the detail but knowing that there has been a major input from Frank Field MP, a fine man, greatly reassures me. I won't vote labour here, but if lived in his constituency,then I most certainly would. He is one of several principled MPs on all sides. Please don't just moan about the coalition. It's more complicated than that.
Get a piece of paper and pen and work out how much a person on minimum wage pays to the Government. Including Income Tax, NI, VAT, fuel duty, car tax and tax indirectly going to the Government through goods and services you will find it approaches 50%! Bankers, moguls, comedians, footballers wouldn't like that would they!
June 21 2012 at 5:33 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyPerhaps if this government got rid of K2 then these rich tax dodgers will pay for it.I i know it will not happen as it is far better to take it off the sick and disabled than the rich isn't it Cameron?
June 21 2012 at 5:13 AM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down Replythe government won't get rid of K2 because I expect most of them are using it. It is one rule for those that have money and another for the rest of us who have to pay for them to have their luxury lifestyle.
June 21 2012 at 6:07 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down Reply
Financial disasters of the last century
Claim today: Five little-known tax rebates
Best-selling authors in the UK: could you make a fortune?
10 new cars that will hold their value
HMRC issues list of 'tax dodgers'
Most and least reliable cars
Best-paid Olympians
And the world's most expensive city is...
Motorists stay loyal to British marques
How to complain to the FOS
UK drivers still enticed by open-top motoring
Why are we flocking overseas?