David CameronStefan Rousseau/PA Wire/Press Association Images

The reform of the benefits system has been dominating the news today, with the announcement that young people may be entitled to less and that those with more children will see their benefits capped.

As part of the broad examination of the current system, David Cameron was also due to float the idea of regional benefits -where the amount you receive depends on where you live. However, the idea was dropped at the last minute.

Regional benefits

The theory behind regional benefits is the same as the one behind regional pay rates - which Cameron has championed before. The idea is that the cost of everything varies around the country. From housing to groceries, some people have to fork out more to have the same standard of living as someone living elsewhere in the country.

Regional differences in benefits would enable the government to lower the benefit levels in places where it is cheaper to live.


As an idea, there may well be merits to it. If it was discovered that benefits failed to meet the cost of absolute necessities in some areas, they could be raised, and if they were seen to go far further elsewhere they could be lowered. In many ways it would be fairer - especially as there are regional rates for some benefits already.

So why was the idea shelved?

Politics

Cameron didn't fight shy of some of the difficult issues. In fact there was a distinct air of politics to the announcement, appealing to traditional Conservatives in theory as well as rhetoric. Cameron said: "Those within [the benefits system] grow up with a series of expectations: you can have a home of your own, the state will support you whatever decisions you make, you will always be able to take out no matter what you put in."

"This has sent out some incredibly damaging signals. That it pays not to work. That you are owed something for nothing. It gave us millions of working-age people sitting at home on benefits even before the recession hit. It created a culture of entitlement."

"And it has led to huge resentment amongst those who pay into the system, because they feel that what they're having to work hard for, others are getting without having to put in the effort."

Timing

He, however, left a clue as to why some of his ideas had been shelved. He said: "These are just some of the questions I think we need to have in this debate. Some provocative; some obvious; some long overdue. There's a number of questions I haven't addressed.....But for all, there are broader questions about timing."

It seems, therefore that the timing wasn't right for this suggestion: that while he is fighting the battles for major cuts he does not want to be battling the regions. He concluded: "Raising big questions on welfare, as I have today - it might not win the government support. Frankly a lot of it might rub people up the wrong way."

And perhaps this is not the time to upset people in some of the less well-off areas who could lose some benefits - particularly with a big vote due in Scotland on whether they want to be part of the British system at all.



More stories