Chunnel link leaves £4.8bn debt
Filed under: Investing
Over-optimistic forecasts for passenger demand have left taxpayers "saddled with £4.8 billion of debt" over the HS1 Channel Tunnel rail link, a report by MPs has said.Filed under: Investing
Over-optimistic forecasts for passenger demand have left taxpayers "saddled with £4.8 billion of debt" over the HS1 Channel Tunnel rail link, a report by MPs has said.
'Vulnerable stereotype' challenged
1m families struggle with home cost
Father, overwhelmed by debts, kills himself
The famous faces of bankruptcy
What to do if you are retired and still in debt
Bedroom tax blamed for gran's death
Parents 'landed with £30m app bill'
Welby: we are in long depression
Supermodel Janice Dickinson files for bankruptcy
Rugby player and coach with debts kills himself
Pauper's funerals soar as government refuses to pay
Families '£891 per year worse off'
We encourage lively discussion at AOL. Please be aware when you leave a comment your user name, screen name and photo may be displayed with your comment, visible to everyone on the Internet. If you think a comment is inappropriate, you may click to report it to our monitors for review.
Not an AOL or AIM member? Register for a free account.
I am amazed that anyone would over estimate revenue just to get a project built.
I suppose the word that springs to mind is fraud although those committing fraud have long gone before their duplicity is revealed.
All these so called bright over paid MP`s thinking they know whats best for the country and look at the bleeding mess its in. Its MP`s That`s costing this country money not the people.
July 06 2012 at 6:02 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyMrs Hodge & Co doing a fine job again. Large sums of money are always spent on experts who often get the numbers wildly incorrect. If any of these projects go ahead on anything but the worst case scenario, then that's a gross dereliction of duty.
It's no good just 'blaming' the consultants. Mrs Hodge needs real teeth ( no pun intended ), to enforce consequences for wrong decisions by state employees. The contractors who do the construction work have to perform satisfactorily, if not then there are penalties. People who are paid by tax payers must be no different.
£32 billion to reduce the time it takes to get from Brum to London by 20 whole minutes. It's an expensive joke.
July 06 2012 at 5:18 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down Reply"The Houses of Parliament" in London, England.
Let's have a little quiz:
1. Who meets there?
2. What do they do there?
3. Do they help you in any way?
If your answers were:
1. "Members of the government"
2. "They represent all the people living in the country" and
3. "Yes, they create laws to protect me and my family"
Then let me congratulate you on getting every one of the answers wrong.
Didn't do too well on that quiz? OK, let's have another go:
4. When was slavery abolished?
5. Was slavery legal?
6. Are you in debt to a financial institution?
Here are the answers:
1. The serving officers of a commercial company.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from you.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not you.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and you yourself, are considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is "legal" although it is not "lawful" (you need to discover the difference).
6. No. You are NOT in debt to any financial institution.
Does this seem a little strange to you? If it does, then read on:
http://www.yourstrawman.com/
reduce the prices and get more people travelling, in the long run it would create more money for the train operators, will they do it ,NO, it would mean they would have to wait longer for their bonuses.
July 06 2012 at 3:49 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyPredictions were all right, however, the high ticket costs and the falling economy have made rail traveling only for those who need it absolutely for work and business. A realistic ticket pricing not based on the principle"How to get rich quick"would get passengers in. It would mean a lower ticket price which would be compensated and over subscribed by a larger take up by passengers. It a normalization of the economic situation the price could be adapted to the new values.
July 06 2012 at 3:30 AM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down Reply
Financial disasters of the last century
Claim today: Five little-known tax rebates
Best-selling authors in the UK: could you make a fortune?
10 new cars that will hold their value
HMRC issues list of 'tax dodgers'
Most and least reliable cars
Best-paid Olympians
And the world's most expensive city is...
Motorists stay loyal to British marques
How to complain to the FOS
UK drivers still enticed by open-top motoring
Why are we flocking overseas?