Who bought this recession first place? The labour party were saying we are the richest nation first or second in the world and out economy is groving faster than sun rise so we need skill workforce so we are inviting because British businesses wants them here and without them we cannot fo high. Wow what a dam thoughtful policy been created.

When recession hit the UK labour politicians were saying whole world is in recession. Lie and lie nothing more not whole world but Europe only and as far as USA concern they spending trillions on war and their export to Gulf hit record high so they loosing jobs understanble but UK loosing export orders from Gulf and from Asia is not recession but bad evil policy.

Now we UK was rich and powerful than surely little Europe cannot make UK this much poor and without jobs society so what is there. Mafia operated gangs from abroad who knew UK policies and it weakness with labour while they were in power.

These bogus companies knew labour rely on foreign votes and most foreigners vote for labour and they knew if system is created to bring foreign students and foreign workforce open up bogus companies and colleges so once small time benefit been seen by labour party and once they know more votes on our way once these foreign workforce and foreign student becomes permanent we leave. Yes no fault of the new comers because for better degree and for better living they came just like whole Europe went to USA, Canada, Australia and many other parts of the world for same better living and for American Dream these foreigners too came for dream and better living.

This policy was not thoughful and well planned because politicians do not have time to do it and they know within four years they have to pay of their debt which was borrowed just like everyone else and to meet the cost of living and high life they have to make money and there you go corrupt is the way forward and carry on creating bad policies and find a way to make money so this is what made UK what is today and no wonder young people cannot find jobs and huge debt to pay back to university so without jobs from where they get money from to meet all this cost.

Now they may be wondering thinking that if they had left education at the age of 16 or 18 at list they had no university debt so at list they never lost their four to five years just educating themselves and wasting all that money only to remain at parent home at the age of 30 that is without money, home and family of their own.

What a screw up government nothing more than bloody hooligans unplanned organisation who do not hold any moral values.

My son, his wife and child decided to stay near grandparents (about 12 miles) so we can all support each other. I had no help whatsoever from my parents when my children were young as they lived about 150 miles away. Such help would have been invaluable and I have to say they missed so much.

I am 34 and unfort still live at home. I would love my own place but just simply cant afford it and I'm in full time employment. If I did move out I would be skint every month and be always be in debt with the bills. While I'm home I have holidays and new cars,lol. The only way I can see myself moving out is if I get a partner and have 2 incomes. I have though been thinking of buying my parents house from the housing company as they would get the full £75,000 discount off because of the new discounts brought in by the governement.

if the government get their way and stop housing benefits for 25s and under the parents will have them back like it or not.

There is no general rule of thumb about when or how children ought to move away from parents. It depends on so many factors. As an aside I find the article interesting given that thanks to the greed of our politicians and financiers far more grown up 'Kids' are HAVING to live with their parents for not only can they not afford a mortgage, too many of them cannot even afford to rent, but then our pampered ruling elite would not understand that since money is the one concern theyve made sure they never have!

I think goverment should support children that still living with their parents, as this is beneficial for both parts, both sides can support not only economically and psicologically , but when they got children also , children can have the opportunity to live and enjoye live with granparents , and then when parents get old they can give something back to them and look after them in the same way they did with theyre children and granchildren. It should be like this, for ever.

I was a foster mother and one of my kids is still with me and he is 29 years of age. He can't afford to move out. Rents here in Cornwall are astronimical, 750 pound a month for a two bedroom cottage, who can afford that. Anyway, I don't want him to go, I likes having him here with me. Gives me something to do, washing and cooking for him. He's a good lad and he can stay as long as he likes. He is working and still lives poorly because of these crooks in Power. I don't mean the Conservatives, I mean all of 'em. There is nothing to choose between the blooming lot of 'em. me andsome.

And, lack of work forcing them to stay with parents too! So I think its the goverments policies of mass unemployment that is seriously unhealthy.

Sorry why is this person reporting that it is unhealthy to live near your parents especially when you can support each other through health problems, childcare etc etc. Not only that this government want families to take on the responsibilities of the elderly grandparents etc. Its lack of work in certain areas that are forcing people to move away from their families.

I am an empty nester and my only child now lives in France. Having worked hard for his degree there was nothing in his own country for him. After two years he went to work in France, met and married a French girl and they have a house and baby. He will never return. His own country let us both down. Neither he nor I can afford to visit the other. I am eternally heartbroken but I am glad that life is treating him well now.