Starbucks has racked up £1.2bn in UK sales for the last three years. But the world's second biggest coffee chain has paid precisely zero in UK income tax. Starbucks - it has 735 outlets in the UK - hasn't done anything illegal.

But it's another example of legal tax avoidance measures deployed by corporates, putting more pressure on UK taxpayers.


De-tax to go

The issue is complicated by Starbucks claiming that the UK business is profitable despite accounts filed through Companies House claiming to show sustained losses - despite Starbucks telling investors that the UK business is profitable.

Quite how a business turns operating profits into tax losses is still unclear, but it's likely labyrinthine royalty and tax arrangements through a subsidiary supply chain, often referred to as transfer pricing, plays a large part.


Because Starbucks appear to pay barely any UK tax, that means more pressure on HM Treasury to extract taxes from other sources. Like ordinary non-chain coffee shops and snack bars that do have to pay their full whack in taxes (and who can't afford tax specialists to advise them on funnelling tax through offshore havens or partner businesses or subsidiaries).

Not a bean

HMRC says they don't comment on the tax affairs of individual businesses though it claims it does use specialist tax experts to ensure that multinationals play by the rules. But clearly their effectiveness - particularly with regard to corporation tax liability and the UK tax code - looks questionable.

Especially when you compare the profits of Whitbread-owned Costa: Costa shelled out £15m last year in profits, about a third of its total profits. In total, it's thought Starbucks paid just £8.5m in tax - in almost 15 years of UK trading.

This story follows concerns about other multi-nationals like Amazon that also pay very little in corporation tax. Defenders of such corporate tax practices point to the job creation opportunities such companies provide.



More stories