Cable seeks tax avoidance crackdown
Filed under: Tax
The UK needs to "beef up" action against tax avoidance and subterfuge by big firms, Business Secretary Vince Cable said, accusing some of engaging in "systematic abuse".Filed under: Tax
The UK needs to "beef up" action against tax avoidance and subterfuge by big firms, Business Secretary Vince Cable said, accusing some of engaging in "systematic abuse".
Aircraft plan switch 'to cost £74m'
Cable in muddle over One Direction
Five and a half million people paid wrong tax in...
Cable warns on 'reckless' EU exit
Charity demands tax havens action
2,500 council staff paid over £100k
Is National Lottery price rise a 'stealth tax'?
Poor road repairs 'cost £435m'
How the Government spent your money last year
Union warning on tax credit changes
Bedroom tax 'costs more to enforce'
Tobacco duty increase 'not enough'
We encourage lively discussion at AOL. Please be aware when you leave a comment your user name, screen name and photo may be displayed with your comment, visible to everyone on the Internet. If you think a comment is inappropriate, you may click to report it to our monitors for review.
Not an AOL or AIM member? Register for a free account.
he should start by naming and shaming his own sort first
how many mps have accounts abroad ect ect
This government give these companies insentives to trade here,but these loopholes should be closed, and if these companies threaten to pull out of this country then let them,it would hit them harder if they did,why should joe public have to pay the correct tax when these companies are evading it.
November 19 2012 at 11:04 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyterry - just remember they empoy many thousands, pay employment taxes, council taxes , VAT etc - employees also pay taxes , Vat etc - if they pull out it is not a zero sum game - we stand to lose a lot - a Turnover Tax is the solution - that they can't avoid
November 19 2012 at 11:17 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThat would be much fairer a bit like a new PAYE system
November 22 2012 at 9:49 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate downthey didnt invent coffee,that was brought here in this format by a british company,lyons,who opened the wimpy chain,incidently named after wimpy in popeye,i cannot sit outside a coffee shop now,its just wall to wall smokers,usually eastern europeans and no i dont like them,i actually want them all out,answered before you had the chance to ask
December 03 2012 at 8:43 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate downCompanies such as Starbucks, Amazon and Google are avoiding (note avoiding, not evading) £billions of UK tax every year by employing top accountants to exploit these loop-holes. They would argue they are providing thousands of jobs in the economy but so are many other companies such as M & S and Tesco for example, and who pay their tax dues in full every year. It is high time all companies receiving the benefits of trading in the UK paid their fair share of tax - Labour had 13 years to take action on such situations and did absolutely nothing so lets hope Osborne and Cable put their heads together and come up with a workable solution.
November 19 2012 at 10:30 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replydogbury - Don't forget Vince Cable could not even get his own tax affairs right and was investigated by HMRC regarding VAT discrepancies !!!! - Pot - kettle - and black methinks !!!
The foolproof solution to Google, Amazon etc tax avoidence is a turnover tax that can be offset against Corporation Tax paid - that way they cannot avoid the tax and have nothing in the UK in Corporation Tax to offset it against whilst M& S and Tesco and tasx paying UK companies would be able to offset it against their Corporation Tax bill - the turnover tax would be fiscally neutral for UK domiciled companies paying Corporation Tax in the UK .
But as it is simple , sensible and foolproof answer it won't happen - we prefer the complicated , stupid and avoidable approach to taxation !!!!!
All talk as usual but little action. Why do you think they call it RIP OFF BRITAIN because the rich still have there snouts in the trough but are getting more legal and craft about it.
November 19 2012 at 10:10 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyVery simple solution is to impose a turnover tax on all businesses trading in the UK that could then be offset against UK Corporation Tax paid by the business .
UK based companies could then offset it and offshore companies who did not pay Corporation Tax in the UK would not be able to offset it ..
This would be fiscally neutral like Vat- companies pay VAT on sales made and can then relaim it on inputs .
So for example a UK company pays £1 milion in turnover tax and has £1 million taxable profits in the UK - result no additional tax to pay.
A company like Starbucks pays £1 milion in turnover tax but declares no taxable profits in the UK so no tax bil to offset it against - so HMRC are £1 million to the good - if you trade in the UK then you have turnover in the UK , whether the company is legaly based overseas does not change that .
I suggested this to HMRC staff years ago but they are not interested because it is HMRC staff who benefit from these tax avoidence schemes - the vast majority are dreamed up by ex HMRC staff .
If MR Cable REALLY wants to stop tax avoidence he should insist that HMRC Staff Contracts contain a Restraint of Trade and Business Secrets Clause in their Employment Contracts making it unlawful for them to work in any tax advisory capacity for a period of 5 years after leaving HMRC employment .
How about Taxing the profit MP's make from selling Houses that were funded by the Tax payer?
How about Taxing MP's for rental received from other MP's whilst buying a House via Taxpayers assistance?
How about Taxing MP's on the Travel Allowance they get for travelling on Trains and planes...surely it is a benefit in Kind and cannot be shown to be essential to their job...I know HMRC will not give me any allowance for travelling to and from MY place of work.
IF an MP wants a Computer, surely they should pay for it themselves and not have the Taxpayer pick up the bill.
Why do MP's get such huge subsidies on the Food and drink available in Parliament.
IS IT TRUE that MP's who drive into the underground garage at Parliament get DUTY FREE PETROL ad DIESEL?
I agree with Mr Cable, stop the abuse and dodgers of Tax and we will all be better off, Here is a NOVEL suggestion,
WHY NOT HAVE MP'S LEAD THE WAY and illustrate how good a role model they can be.
If Starbucks are making a loss in the UK, why don't they close down? Everyone else has.
November 19 2012 at 6:55 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replytyrigough- because it is like the banana business in the UK - they buy the bananas via an offshore company who marks up the price hugely when selling them to the UK distribution company - the UK distribution company then sells to the shops basically just covering their distribution costs so they make no profit or even a small loss in the UK - but this is more than made up for by a huge margin on the profit they make on the " wholesaling " business outside the UK .
This is a £ multi BILLION a year business in the UK ( just think of the number of bananas sold ) yet they have paid next to nothing in UK tax for well over 30 years .
Starbucks likewise make their money in selling the ground coffee to the UK shops - the shops have to buy from a Starbucks owned supplier in Switzerland - not on selling cups of coffee to the public
Financial disasters of the last century
Claim today: Five little-known tax rebates
Best-selling authors in the UK: could you make a fortune?
10 new cars that will hold their value
HMRC issues list of 'tax dodgers'
Most and least reliable cars
Best-paid Olympians
And the world's most expensive city is...
Motorists stay loyal to British marques
How to complain to the FOS
UK drivers still enticed by open-top motoring
Why are we flocking overseas?