<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Money</title>
<link>http://money.aol.co.uk</link>
<description>Money</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Osborne to defend benefits shake-up</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2011/11/12066145.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />George Osborne will mount an uncompromising defence of the coalition's controversial benefits shake-up, insisting Britain can no longer afford to reward people who do the "wrong thing".<br />
<br />
The Chancellor is to condemn the old system as "broken", warning Labour that they are out of step with public opinion on the issue.<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
The intervention comes after 660,000 social housing tenants deemed to have a spare room began to lose an average &pound;14 a week in what critics have dubbed a "bedroom tax". Wider welfare and tax changes coming into force this month will also see council tax benefit funding cut, and working-age benefits and tax credit rises pegged at 1% - well below inflation - for three years.<br />
<br />
Disability living allowance (DLA) is being replaced by the personal independence payment (PIP), while trials are due to begin in four London boroughs of a &pound;500-a-week cap on household benefits, and of the new Universal Credit system.<br />
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith said the changes were about "fairness", but he was also facing a backlash after suggesting that he could get by on &pound;53 a week, as one benefit recipient argued they were having to, rather than his current after-tax income of &pound;1,600 a week. "If I had to I would," Mr Duncan Smith told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. In the wake of the comment, more than 30,000 people signed a petition on the change.org website, calling for the minister to try surviving on that money for a year.<br />
<br />
Speaking at a supermarket in Kent, Mr Osborne will insist that nine out of 10 working households will be better off as a result of the welfare and tax changes. "For too long, we've had a system where people who did the right thing - who get up in the morning and work hard - felt penalised for it, while people who did the wrong thing got rewarded for it," he will say. "That's wrong... This month we will make work pay."<br />
<br />
Mr Osborne will dismiss "depressingly predictable outrage" about reforms, saying he wants to "take the argument" to critics. "Because defending every line item of welfare spending isn't credible in the current economic environment," he is to say. "Because defending benefits that trap people in poverty and penalise work is defending the indefensible. The benefit system is broken, it penalises those who try to do the right thing, and the British people badly want it fixed. We agree - and those who don't are on the wrong side of the British public."<br />
<br />
But shadow Treasury minister Chris Leslie pointed out that the top rate of tax was being cut from 50p to 45p. "While millionaires get an average &pound;100,000 tax cut this week Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) figures show that the average family will be &pound;891 worse off this year because of tax and benefit changes since 2010," he said. "And just looking at the new changes this week the poorest 10% are losing &pound;127 while the richest 10% gain 10 times that - &pound;1,265. Labour would not be making these deeply unfair choices this week.<br />
<br />
"The benefits bill is rising under this Government because our economy is flatlining, prices are rising faster than wages and unemployment is high. And it is this Government's cuts to tax credits which have left thousands of working parents better off if they quit their job. The best way to get the benefits bill down is to get our economy growing strongly and get people back to work."<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, research from the Resolution Foundation said those on lower and middle incomes could lose much of the money from future tax cuts. As Universal Credit is based on post-tax income, around two-thirds of the effect of a rise in the tax-free allowance would be offset by a reduction in their benefits. By contrast, better-off families who do not get Universal Credit would pocket the full amount. The think tank's associate fellow, Donald Hirsch, said: "If the Government really wants to help low-earning families through tax cuts, it will need to adjust Universal Credit so that they receive at least the same benefit as those higher up the income scale. If they fail to do this, tax cuts simply won't accomplish what they're intended to."<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20526320/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/02/osborne-to-defend-benefits-shake-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>benefits-stories</category><category>budget 2013</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-04-02T08:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Why does George Osborne hate self-employed women?</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2012/03/12769769-1331224816.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left; " />The current system actively penalises self-employed women. Why?<br />
<br />
I'm a hard-working mother of one, with number two due any day now. I work as a freelance journalist and copywriter, juggling my work commitments with caring for a boisterous toddler. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that I work very hard, as most parents of young children do.<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
Yet the system doesn't reward my hard work. In fact, I believe that self-employed women are penalised by the country's current maternity leave laws, and I can't understand why you haven't addressed that. Maybe you haven't noticed?<br />
<br />
Here's why the current maternity pay and allowance system actually incentivises self-employed women to give up work.<br />
<br />
<strong>Different limits, different rights</strong><br />
First of all, let's take a look at what employed women get. Statutory maternity pay (SMP) is currently &pound;135.45 a week or 90% of earnings lower than that. During the Maternity Pay Period (MPP), women can work in a self-employed capacity without losing their pay.<br />
<br />
When I had my first baby I told my employer I didn't plan to return and took statutory maternity leave before handing in my notice. I didn't feel bad about that, I'd paid my NI and the company could reclaim my SMP through HMRC. I'd also been very honest about my plans rather than keeping quiet and hedging my bets.<br />
<br />
Most importantly for our family finances, there was nothing stopping me from setting up as a freelancer while I was on maternity leave. The Department for Work and Pensions states: "If you do any work in a self-employed capacity during your MPP, then such work will not affect your SMP."<br />
<br />
So I was able to start building up my freelancing during my maternity leave. At the end of my maternity break, I was an economically active individual who continued to pay tax.<br />
<br />
Now I am about to have baby number two and it's all changed. Because I am self-employed, I cannot receive SMP but I can claim Maternity Allowance of &pound;135.45 a week or 90% of earnings lower than that. So far, so fair.<br />
<br />
However, unlike when I was receiving SMP, I cannot work in a freelance capacity without losing that entitlement. Over the 39-week period I can claim for, I'm allowed to work ten 'keep in touch' (KIT) days without ending my allowance. However, if I work more than those then I'm deemed to be back at work.<br />
<br />
Frustratingly, that doesn't mean I can work for 80 hours stretched over the period - if I spend just five minutes emailing a client then that counts as a full day.<br />
<br />
The DWP explains: "Any work you do as a KIT day, even as little as half an hour for example, will be counted as a whole day for KIT days."<br />
<br />
In short, the vast majority of self-employed women face a tough decision. Either they take a far shorter maternity leave or they shut up shop. That means that at the end of their paid leave, they have to start building up their business all over again - making it likely they will pay less tax during that period.<br />
<br />
George, why on earth would you have a system that incentivises self-employed women to cease trading?<br />
<br />
<strong>The numbers affected</strong><br />
So just how many women could be in my position? 'Many' is the answer. The press has extensively covered the rise of the 'mumpreneur'; women who go it alone in order to work flexibly around their family commitments.<br />
<br />
In fact, a survey by the Office for National Statistics back in 2009 showed that women were nearly five times more likely to cite family as their reason for becoming self-employed.<br />
<br />
And it's not just flexible working hours fuelling the rise; as the economy flounders more women need to work to fund their families. You may have noticed that it's a pretty tough jobs market just now.<br />
<br />
Many employers will hesitate to employ mothers of young children, as we do tend to need flexible or part-time hours and we have to take time off when our kids are sick. A report from the TUC found that women were behind more than half the increase in self-employment since the recession began.<br />
<br />
We are making our own jobs, we're making our own way and we're paying into the country's coffers. So why does the current system incentivise us to go out of business?<br />
<br />
<strong>A question of fairness</strong><br />
Maybe some people reading this will think it's unfair that employed parents can freelance during their maternity leave and not lose their pay. Maybe some people will say that no one should have kids if they don't have money saved in the bank to cover their baby break - I see comments like that on news sites and blogs a lot.<br />
<br />
Of course I disagree with that position, but it's a separate issue really. Currently, self-employed women are worse off than employed women, despite paying NI and tax.<br />
<br />
And on top of that, we lack job security, company pensions, death-in-service benefits or any of the perks of employment. We can't even save money by claiming childcare vouchers as an employer has to issue those - an issue I hope the Government plans to address in the 2015 childcare voucher changes. Read <a href="http://www.lovemoney.com/news/family-finance/family-finance/20215/parents-given-1200-under-new-childcare-scheme" target="_blank">Parents can reclaim up to &pound;1,200 under new childcare scheme for more</a>.<br />
<br />
But I'm not complaining about that; going freelance was my choice and there are many perks. The most important one is that I can spend more time with my babies.<br />
<br />
However, I cannot understand why the current system actively encourages self-employed mums to close down their businesses.<br />
<br />
Mr Osborne, it's illegal for a company to penalise a woman or harm her career because she took maternity leave. Yet under the current system, that's exactly what the state is doing to self-employed mums every day. This isn't fair and it can't make economic sense - you need our taxes and you don't want us claiming unemployment benefits.<br />
<br />
<strong>What do you think? Is the current system fair? Would you iron out the unfairness by stopping women on statutory maternity leave from working too? Or do you agree that Osborne is preventing mums from maintaining successful businesses? Have your say in the comments below.</strong><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20521482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/28/why-does-george-osborne-hate-self-employed-women/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>family-stories</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>lovemoney.com</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-28T10:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: the small print</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2012/10/pa-13280722osborne.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
We've taken a look through the Budget red book to see what George Osborne is planning that he didn't announce in his speech.<br />
<br />
"The devil is in the detail", or so the old adage goes. And that's never more true than at Budget time. Chancellor George Osborne may have spoken to Parliament for the best part of an hour, but there are usually plenty of things he didn't mention tucked away in the Budget book.<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
We've pored through it to see what other measures are on the horizon.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Bank of England can let inflation go... temporarily</strong><br />
There was talk in the speech about the Bank of England's "new remit", but what the red book says is that the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee may "therefore wish to allow inflation to deviate from the target temporarily".<br />
<br />
<strong>Consultation on allowing Child Trust Funds to move to Junior ISAs</strong><br />
The Labour Government's flagship Child Trust Fund (CTF) scheme was one of the first things scrapped by the Coalition. It introduced Junior ISAs instead. As a result, the parents of those children who had money invested in cash or stocks and shares CTF accounts have, in many cases, seen their returns fall as providers have pulled the shutters down. Meanwhile, more competitive Junior ISAs have been launched. Following a series of campaigns, the Government will now consult on allowing CTFs to be switched into Junior ISAs.<br />
<br />
<strong>Right To Buy period</strong><br />
The qualifying period for council tenants who want to buy their own homes will be reduced from five years to three. The Government is pledging to replace council homes that are sold on a one-to-one basis. The Right To Buy process will also be simplified.<br />
<br />
<strong> Social housing</strong><br />
Landlords of tenants in social housing who earn over &pound;60,000 a year will be allowed to charge them market rent. Tenants will also be required to declare their income.<br />
<br />
<strong>Broadband spending cut?</strong><br />
There will be a "reprofiling of funding for broadband programmes", which in plain English sounds like a cut to this plan.<br />
<br />
<strong>Employee share scheme</strong><br />
The Chancellor did briefly mention in his speech that this scheme would become "more generous". The detail is that employees will not pay Income Tax and National Insurance on the first &pound;2,000 of any shares they receive. And this scheme is due to launch in September 2013.<br />
<br />
<strong> More Bank of Daves?</strong><br />
Dave Fishwick, owner of Burnley Savings and Loans and featured in the Channel 4 documentary Bank of Dave, has famously struggled to get a banking licence. The Budget book says that the "authorisation process for becoming a bank will be quicker and easier and there will be a comprehensive series of changes to the capital and liquidity rules to level the playing field for new banks". Whether that will lead to a rash of new 'challenger' banks remains to be seen.<br />
<br />
<strong>Residential property in private pensions</strong><br />
The Government is to "explore" whether the conversion of unused commercial property in urban areas into homes could be helped by allowing people to add them to their Self Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs) and Small Self Administered Schemes (SSASs). Pensions experts have already warned that this could leave people's retirement incomes far too exposed to property, given many people already see their current home as part of their pension.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20516491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/25/budget-2013-the-small-print/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>lovemoney.com</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-25T07:11:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Osborne: 'It could be a lot worse'</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div>
	<img alt="George Osborne"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/georgeowithbriefcase.gif" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />Chancellor George Osborne has defended his Budget, saying the Government had to tackle the nation's economic problems, which "could be a lot worse".</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Mr Osborne, who promised hope for an "aspiration nation" in his fourth budget to the Commons, told ITV1's Daybreak that he "wanted to be straight with the nation about the problems we face".</span><br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<div>
	Referring to the current crisis in Cyprus, he said: "It's a difficult situation, but it could be a lot worse. You only have to watch your news bulletins to see other countries, not far from here, who have not confronted their problems and who are worried about getting money out of the bank.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"It's a difficult situation. It's a difficult neighbourhood.</div>
<br />
<div>
	"We have made a lot of mistakes as a country, over many years, building up these debts. But my determination is not to run away but to confront them head on."</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Mr Osborne put his strongest emphasis on measures to encourage jobs, home-ownership and small businesses.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	He brought a planned increase in income tax thresholds to &pound;10,000 forward to 2014, which Tory aides said meant that everyone who paid the 10p tax rate under Labour will next year be taken out of the tax altogether.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Shadow chancellor Ed Balls said only the rich were better off following Mr Osborne's Budget.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	He said: "He told us two years ago he would get the economy growing, get rising living standards and get the deficit down.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"Borrowing is up, the national debt is rising, the economy is absolutely flat and everybody in our country is worse off year by year, apart from the rich. It's not working."</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20513100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/osborne-it-could-be-a-lot-worse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>economy</category><category>george osborne</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Could Osborne's beer duty cut be illegal?</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div class="photo-block">
	<p class="photo-caption" style="width:284px;float:left;padding-right:10px;">
		<img alt="pint of beer" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/pa-16088325.jpg" style="height: 189px; width: 284px;" /></p>
</div>
There are plenty of winners and losers from this week's Budget statement. However, while everyone argues about the implications of tax changes and whether the housing market is really set for recovery, we can all agree one one thing: everyone has to be pleased with a 1p cut in the duty on a pint of beer.<br />
<br />
Actually not everyone.... wine and spirits producers are livid, and are even claiming that the move could break the law.<br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<h4>
	Why do it?</h4>
George Osborne's treatment of alcohol in the Budget was clearly the result of a couple of compromises.<br />
<br />
There was some pressure to keep alcohol duty on the escalator - which sees prices increase by at least inflation plus 2% in every Budget. David Cameron has been such an outspoken critic of discounted bargain booze in supermarkets that it made no sense to freeze the duty.<br />
<br />
It means that the price of a bottle of wine will go up by 10p on Sunday, while the price of a bottle of spirits will increase by 53p. According to the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, this means that since the escalator was introduced in 2008 it has put 67p on a bottle of wine and &pound;2.38 on a 70cl bottle of vodka.<br />
<br />
However, at the same time, pubs and brewers argued that pub closures are destroying the hearts of towns and villages across the UK, and something needed to be done. Pulling beer off the escalator, and cutting duty by a penny was Osborne's way of doing that - and garnering some enthusiasm from the voting public at the same time.<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Unfair?</h4>
The problem is that treating different types of alcohol differently is being seen as unfair. Wine and Spirit Trade Association Chief Executive Miles Beale said: "This is bad news for the UK wine and spirits sector, with year on year duty increases hitting consumers and businesses hard."<br />
<br />
He added: "If this was designed as a measure to support pubs it seems misplaced: over 41% of drinks sold in pubs are wine and spirits, contributing &pound;9.4 billion per year. The Chancellor's decision ignores the growing value of the English wine industry and the UK spirits industry, which accounts for 18% of all jobs in the EU spirits industry."<br />
<br />
Gavin Hewitt, chief executive of the Scotch Whisky Association, added: "This is an unfair and incomprehensible attack on the Scotch Whisky industry in its domestic market, where it is a vital part of the Scottish and UK economy and where it supports many other businesses. It penalises responsible drinkers who like a dram rather than a pint. There is no justification for spirits being taxed more heavily than beer."<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Illegal?</h4>
More to the point, Beale said the move may well be illegal. He said: "It makes little sense to single out beer, particularly as there is a legal precedent to suggest that the Government is unable to do so."<br />
<br />
The legal precedent he is referring to is a decision made by the European Court of Justice in 1983, which said that the duty regime in the UK at the time discriminated against wine. The court ruled that because wine and beer were competing products they ought to be taxed at the same rate. Beale has said he is exploring the issue further.<br />
<br />
The Treasury may take some comfort from the fact that the European Court ruled in 2008 that Sweden was not breaking the law by treating wine and beer differently. It said that the difference in the duty on the products was not enough to influence consumer buying behaviour.  <br />
There's definitely an argument that 1p off a pint of beer is not going to make any hardened wine drinker put down the bottle and order a pint. However, it begs the question as to whether this will still be the case a few years down the line if inflation pushes the price of wine even higher and the Treasury chooses to leave beer alone.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20513156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/could-osbornes-beer-duty-cut-be-illegal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>beer</category><category>Budget 2013</category><category>duty</category><category>europe</category><category>george osborne</category><category>pubs</category><category>tax</category><category>the budget</category><dc:creator>Sarah Coles</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T10:23:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Mortgage support measures may do more harm than good</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><img alt="11 Downing St" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/11downingst.gif" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />There are two components to the new 'help-to-buy' scheme.<br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<div>
	<strong>1. Newly built homes</strong></div>
<div>
	If you want to buy a newly built home and you don't have much money for a mortgage deposit, the Government may help you.</div>
<br />
<div>
	As long as you have enough money for a 5% deposit, the Government will give you an interest-free loan for 20% of the home's value. Then you'll only have to borrow a 75% loan from the bank or building society. That may mean you can get a lower rate on your mortgage.</div>
<br />
<div>
	The Government's loan will be interest-free for five years. This offer is only available for homes that are selling for &pound;600,000 or less.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>2. New mortgage guarantee</strong></div>
<div>
	The Government's mortgage guarantee should help a wider range of home buyers, not just for newly built homes.</div>
<br />
<div>
	The guarantee will be for loans where there is only a small deposit - also known as high LTV (loan-to-value) loans.</div>
<br />
<div>
	High LTV loans are riskier for lenders. That's because there's a greater risk they won't get their money back in the end.</div>
<br />
<div>
	So interest rates are normally higher for these loans and some home buyers have struggled to get any loan whatsoever.</div>
<br />
<div>
	The Government is now saying that it will pay up if a lender can't get all its money back from a high LTV loan - this would normally be because a sale of a home doesn't raise enough cash to pay off the loan.</div>
<br />
<div>
	This guarantee will reduce the risk for lenders, so it should mean that more potential buyers will be able to get mortgages and interest rates for High LIV loans should be lower too.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>What could be possibly wrong?</strong></div>
<div>
	So why am I not keen on this scheme? After all, more people should be able to get their foot on the housing ladder.</div>
<br />
<div>
	My concern is that the scheme's 'unintended consequences' may be more serious than many folk now realise. This has certainly been the case with the Funding for Lending scheme which has pushed down interest rates on savings accounts.</div>
<br />
<div>
	I fear that 'help-to-buy' may give an unwelcome boost to house prices. More mortgages means more buyers and more demand, pushing up prices. And that's not good news for first-time buyers.</div>
<br />
<div>
	The best way to help first-time buyers is to increase the supply of new homes which will drive down prices. I grew up in the green belt and a big part of me is reluctant to build homes on farmland, but I think it's the only way to restore sanity to our property market.</div>
<br />
<div>
	Building more homes on brownfield sites in towns and cities will help too.</div>
<br />
<div>
	For too many years, Governments supported the mortgage market through mortgage interest tax relief. Effectively that meant the Government would pay some of your mortgage interest bill. This tax relief helped to push up house prices and distorted our economy.</div>
<br />
<div>
	Economists railed against this relief year-after-year but our politicians didn't have the guts to abolish it until the late 90s.</div>
<br />
<div>
	But now we're returning to Government support for the mortgage market. I predict future chancellors will find it just as hard to remove these new support measures.</div>
<br />
<div>
	And anyway, the mortgage market is already very healthy for a large number of borrowers - they're benefitting from super-low interest rates.</div>
<br />
<div>
	Granted, it's a different story for folk with small deposits. They can struggle to get loans and often have to pay relatively high interest rates. Yes, Osborne's new scheme will help some of these people buy a home more quickly than would otherwise be the case, but it will also boost house prices. And I don't think that's in the interest of first-time buyers now or in the future.</div>
<br />
<div>
	We need more new house building and less Government support for the mortgage industry.<br />
	<br />
	&nbsp;</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20512992/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mortgage-support-measures-may-do-more-harm-than-good/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>george osborne</category><category>news</category><category>property</category><category>property-guide</category><dc:creator>lovemoney.com</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T09:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: the small print</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div>
	<img alt="George Osborne" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/georgeosborne1.gif" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />"The devil is in the detail", or so the old adage goes. And that's never more true than at Budget time. Chancellor George Osborne may have spoken to Parliament for the best part of an hour, but there are usually plenty of things he didn't mention tucked away in the Budget book.</div>
<br />
We've pored through it to see what other measures are on the horizon.<br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<div>
	<strong>The Bank of England can let inflation go... temporarily</strong></div>
<div>
	There was talk in the speech about the Bank of England's "new remit", but what the red book says is that the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee may "therefore wish to allow inflation to deviate from the target temporarily".</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Consultation on allowing Child Trust Funds to move to Junior ISAs</strong></div>
<div>
	The Labour Government's flagship Child Trust Fund (CTF) scheme was one of the first things scrapped by the Coalition. It introduced Junior ISAs instead. As a result, the parents of those children who had money invested in cash or stocks and shares CTF accounts have, in many cases, seen their returns fall as providers have pulled the shutters down. Meanwhile, more competitive Junior ISAs have been launched. Following a series of campaigns, the Government will now consult on allowing CTFs to be switched into Junior ISAs.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Right To Buy period</strong></div>
<div>
	The qualifying period for council tenants who want to buy their own homes will be reduced from five years to three. The Government is pledging to replace council homes that are sold on a one-to-one basis. The Right To Buy process will also be simplified.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Social housing</strong></div>
<div>
	Landlords of tenants in social housing who earn over &pound;60,000 a year will be allowed to charge them market rent. Tenants will also be required to declare their income.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Broadband spending cut?</strong></div>
<div>
	There will be a "reprofiling of funding for broadband programmes", which in plain English sounds like a cut to this plan.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Employee share scheme</strong></div>
<div>
	The Chancellor did briefly mention in his speech that this scheme would become "more generous". The detail is that employees will not pay Income Tax and National Insurance on the first &pound;2,000 of any shares they receive. And this scheme is due to launch in September 2013.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>More Bank of Daves?</strong></div>
<div>
	Dave Fishwick, owner of Burnley Savings and Loans and featured in the Channel 4 documentary Bank of Dave, has famously struggled to get a banking licence. The Budget book says that the "authorisation process for becoming a bank will be quicker and easier and there will be a comprehensive series of changes to the capital and liquidity rules to level the playing field for new banks". Whether that will lead to a rash of new 'challenger' banks remains to be seen.</div>
<br />
<div>
	<strong>Residential property in private pensions</strong></div>
<div>
	The Government is to "explore" whether the conversion of unused commercial property in urban areas into homes could be helped by allowing people to add them to their Self Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs) and Small Self Administered Schemes (SSASs). Pensions experts have already warned that this could leave people's retirement incomes far too exposed to property, given many people already see their current home as part of their pension.<br />
	<br />
	&nbsp;</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20512979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-2013-the-small-print/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><category>pensions</category><dc:creator>lovemoney.com</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T08:39:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Tobacco duty increase 'not enough'</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?playList=517311400&amp;height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=SOLR&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<div>
	<img alt="Cigarette" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/cigarette.jpg" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 166px; width: 284px; float: left;" />The Chancellor should have taken a tougher stance on increasing duty on tobacco products, health campaigners have said.</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Duty will rise by 2% above inflation from 6pm on Wednesday.</span><br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	But health charity Ash (Action on Smoking and Health) said George Osborne should have increased duty to 5% to encourage smokers to kick the habit.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Chief executive Deborah Arnott said: "This is disappointing. If the Government had increased tobacco tax by 5% as we requested it would have increased Government revenues and helped more smokers to quit smoking.</div>
<br />
<div>
	"Cigarettes are still more affordable than they were in the 1960s and there is a danger that smokers will simply trade down to cheaper brands rather than stop smoking."</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	The Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation said any increase in the price of tobacco would help people quit.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Eileen Streets, director of tobacco control at the charity, said: "We believe raising taxes on tobacco helps encourage smokers to quit and in turn dramatically improve the health of our nation.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"We know the cost of cigarettes is one of the main reasons people decide to quit and now the Government has announced that duty rates on tobacco products will increase by 2% there is no better time to quit.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"We are pleased with this as not only will quitting improve individual's health but also improve finances."<br />
	<br />
	&nbsp;</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20512757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/tobacco-duty-increase-not-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>cigarettes</category><category>government</category><category>health</category><category>news</category><category>tax-stories</category><category>tobacco</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T05:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>MPs set to debate Budget details</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div>
	<img alt="George Osborne"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/georgeosborne.jpg" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 173px; width: 284px; float: left;" />MPs are to drill down into the detail of the Budget after George Osborne's statement for an "aspiration nation".</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Detailed debate on a raft of measures to kick-start growth, including ploughing billions into boosting home ownership, amid gloomy economic forecasts will resume in the Commons as polling showed a mixed response from voters.</span><br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<div>
	Research for consumer group Which? carried out immediately after the Budget found 89% of voters backed the rise in the personal tax allowance to &pound;10,000 and 87% supported moves to scrap the fuel duty rise. </div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	But the survey found a third of the public now feels less confident about the prospects for the economy over the coming year while 28% are less confident about their personal finances. The poll also shows 59% believe the Government should rethink its economic plan and 44% expect their personal finances to worsen in the next 12 months.</div>
<br />
<div>
	Hours after the Chancellor sat down peers inflicted a major defeat on the Government over its "shares for rights" plan, detailed in the Budget document, with former Civil Service head Lord O'Donnell linking the plans to slavery and Tory former Cabinet minister Lord Forsyth of Drumlean branding the plans "ill-thought through, confused and muddled".</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Mr Osborne attempted to divert attention from the economic gloom as growth forecasts were slashed and official forecasters warned that deficit reduction had "stalled" with eye-catching give-aways. A penny has been knocked off the price of a pint of beer and September's planned 3p rise in fuel duty has been scrapped.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	But the Chancellor put his strongest emphasis on measures to encourage jobs, home-ownership and small businesses. He brought a planned increase in income tax thresholds to &pound;10,000 forward to 2014, which Tory aides said meant that everyone who paid the 10p tax rate under Labour will next year be taken out of the tax altogether.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Labour leader Ed Miliband attacked Mr Osborne as a "downgraded Chancellor" offering "more of the same - higher borrowing, lower growth".</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Forecasts published by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) showed it had halved its prediction for GDP growth for this year from 1.2% to 0.6% and trimmed next year's forecast from 2% to 1.8%. And the independent body said that the decline in borrowing seen in the first years of the coalition Government "now appears to have stalled". The OBR predicted a small increase in GDP in the first quarter of this year, meaning that the UK will avoid an unprecedented triple-dip recession.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Public sector net borrowing forecasts were revised upwards in every year to 2017/18, adding a total of &pound;55.7 billion to the amount the Chancellor is expecting to borrow over the next five years compared to his plans at the time of the December Autumn Statement. Debt will not fall as a share of national income until two years after Mr Osborne's original 2015 target and will peak at 85.6% of GDP (&pound;1.58 trillion) in 2016/17, an increase of 6.4% on the previous forecasts.</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20512748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/mps-set-to-debate-budget-details/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>economy</category><category>george osborne</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T04:08:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget speech boosts housebuilders</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<img  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2011/11/lse.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left; " />Shares in Britain's leading housebuilders jumped by as much as 7% after Chancellor George Osborne delivered a Budget-day boost to the sector.<br />
<br />
Under the proposed &pound;3.5 billion Help-to-Buy scheme, the Government will provide an interest-free loan worth 20% of the value of a new-build house to help those with a 5% deposit get on the housing ladder.<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
It was another lift for a sector which has enjoyed improved fortunes in recent months, although the Budget overall failed to cheer the London market as the FTSE 100 Index slipped 18.7 points to 6422.5.<br />
<br />
The decline, which follows a three-day losing streak amid uncertainty over the bailout of debt-laden Cyprus, was compounded by more bad news on the UK economy after figures showed the first increase in unemployment in a year.<br />
<br />
And in a further sign of the squeeze on household budgets, average weekly earnings rose by 1.2% in the three months to January, down from 1.3% between October and December last year and less than half the rate of inflation.<br />
<br />
Miners were again shaken by the uncertain global outlook, with Anglo American down by 53p to 1767p and BHP Billiton off 26.5p to 1955p.<br />
<br />
And Marks &amp; Spencer shares lost some of their recent takeover strength after analysts at Nomura estimated that clothing sales declined by a double-digit percentage figure in the four weeks to February 17. The performance has been impacted by the timing of half-term and the weather but shares still fell 5.75p to 392.35p.<br />
<br />
Royal Bank of Scotland rose 2%, or 4.6p to 298.15p, as Liberum Capital backed chief executive Stephen Hester's turnaround efforts by recommending that investors now buy shares in the part-nationalised bank.<br />
<br />
It expects that RBS will have sold off all its non-core assets by next year and that an upcoming announcement from the Financial Policy Committee on capital strength is likely to clear some of the uncertainty surrounding the banking sector. Barclays fared less well after a fall of 4.1p to 293.6p and Lloyds Banking Group remained flat at 49.4p.<br />
<br />
Among the housebuilders, Barratt Developments rose 17.5p to 257.35p, Taylor Wimpey lifted 5.35p to 90.95p and Persimmon improved 53.5p to 1025p.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/21/budget-speech-boosts-housebuilders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>mortgages</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-21T02:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Tax allowance rise brought forward</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div>
	<img alt="20 pound notes"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/20poundnotes.gif" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />Workers will not pay any tax on the first &pound;10,000 of their wages from next year - 12 months earlier than planned.</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">Bringing forward the increase in the income tax personal allowance will mean a cumulative cash benefit for typical basic rate taxpayers of &pound;705 since the Coalition took power, according to Treasury figures.</span><br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<div>
	From April, the allowance will go up as planned to &pound;9,440 - a &pound;200 boost for 24 million taxpayers, George Osborne said. It will also mean 2.7 million working age adults have been taken out of income tax altogether in the new financial year.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	The basic and higher rates of income tax will remain the same and the Government has stuck by its decision to reduce the top rate of tax on earnings over &pound;150,000 from 50p to 45p next month.</div>
<br />
<div>
	Mr Osborne said: "When we came to office, the personal income tax allowance stood at under &pound;6,500. In two weeks time, the allowance will reach &pound;9,440 with the single largest cash increase in its history."</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	He added: "From 2014, there will be no income tax at all on the first &pound;10,000 of your salary - &pound;10,000 of tax-free earning. That's &pound;700 less in tax for working families than when this Government came to office.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"Almost three million more of the lowest paid will pay no income tax at all. It's a historic achievement for this government and for hard-working families across the country."</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Campaign group the TaxPayers' Alliance said the personal allowance increase would help to ease the burden of high living costs.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Matthew Sinclair, chief executive, said: "George Osborne has announced welcome relief for people struggling with the high cost of living.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	"The cut in beer tax, the freeze in fuel duty and the higher personal allowance will all ease the pressure on family budgets. Unfortunately, the great limitation of this budget was that it relied far too much on complicated targeted reliefs instead of tax cuts across the board."<br />
	<br />
	&nbsp;</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/tax-allowance-rise-brought-forward/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><category>tax</category><category>tax-stories</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T14:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Remit changed in hunt for growth</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div>
	<img alt="Bank of England"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2012/08/13743786.jpg" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" />Chancellor George Osborne has unveiled the first overhaul of the Bank of England's remit in nearly a decade under plans for "monetary activism" in the face of sharp growth downgrades and higher borrowing.</div>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">While confirming the inflation target would remain at 2%, Mr Osborne gave the central bank room to loosen monetary policy by also focusing on economic growth with the freedom to explore "unconventional" measures.</span><br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	But the changes came as a disappointment to some economists, who had been hoping for more radical action.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	The remit review also came against a grim backdrop of lower growth and higher-than-expected borrowing revealed in the Budget as the independent tax and spending watchdog the Office for Budget Responsibility delivered another painful set of forecasts.</div>
<br />
<div>
	The OBR said the UK would narrowly avoid a triple dip recession by eking out growth of 0.1% this quarter, but it halved its growth predictions for the year as a whole to 0.6%, while it said the Government would have to borrow nearly &pound;60 billion more than expected by 2017/18.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	In the year to March, the OBR now expects the Government to borrow &pound;86 billion, &pound;108 billion in the 2013/14 year, &pound;97 billion in the following year, falling to &pound;87 billion, &pound;61 billion and &pound;42 billion in the following years to 2017/18.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	It ruled once more that Mr Osborne will breach his rule that the ratio of net debt to gross domestic product (GDP) will be falling by 2015/16. Debt as a ratio of GDP will now not fall until 2017/18 - two years later than planned.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	The Bank's new remit explicitly allows the Bank to be flexible in its targeting and Mr Osborne has asked the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) to report back on the use of so-called "intermediate thresholds", such as economic stability measures, in its August inflation report.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Policymakers will also be able to provide forward-looking guidance on rates and inflation.</div>
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div>
	Mr Osborne said Bank governor Sir Mervyn King and his successor Mark Carney, who takes over in July, had agreed to the new remit and for the MPC to use "unconventional monetary instruments".<br />
	<br />
	&nbsp;</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/remit-changed-in-hunt-for-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>bank of england</category><category>budget 2013</category><category>economy</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T13:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: the disappointments</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div class="photo-block">
	<p class="photo-caption" style="width:284px;float:left;padding-right:10px;">
		<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/fotoflexerphoto-1363797649.jpg" style="height: 189px; width: 284px;" /></p>
</div>
In a incredibly tough climate with very little funds to spare, the Chancellor delivered a Budget scattered with welcome measures to help working families.<br />
<br />
But what areas did he overlook amid the headline-grabbing announcements on childcare, property and beer?<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<br />
<strong>No help for highstreet</strong><br />
The Chancellor overlooked our floundering highstreets in his Budget statement today, offering no help to boost the retail sector.<br />
<br />
"This was the Chancellor's opportunity to maximise retailers' contribution to re-establishing growth by keeping more money in customers' pockets and leaving retailers with more money they can invest," said Helen Dickinson, director general of the British Retail Consortium.<br />
<br />
"But, pressing on with a third-successive substantial business rates rise is very disappointing. Freezing rates would have made a real difference to our troubled high streets and the communities that rely on them."<br />
<br />
<strong>Growth forecast down</strong><br />
The Chancellor was forced to backtrack on growth, making a forecast of just 0.6% for 2014 - 2% lower than the forecast made two years ago. Surely signs that his deficit reduction strategy needs a rethink.<br />
<br />
"Chancellor George Osborne described the UK government's economic strategy as one of monetary activism and fiscal responsibility but the world is coming round to realise that a loose monetary, tight fiscal policy mix is unlikely to lead to a recovery in growth when interest rates are close to zero and consumers are intent on paying down debt," explains Trevor Greetham, director of asset allocation at Fidelity Worldwide Investment. "The UK should follow the successful US lead and ease back on austerity until a recovery is well under way."<br />
<br />
<strong>Delay in Corporation Tax cut</strong><br />
The announcement to bring Corporation Tax down in line with the small business rate of 20% is welcome for a much-needed boost to British business, but why the delay until 2015?<br />
<br />
"We are disappointed that it will be two years before this comes into effect," said Martin Hook, managing director of research and development tax specialists, Alma Consulting Group. "We would prefer for Corporation Tax to be reduced sooner to deliver immediate benefits to businesses and speed up the economic recovery."<br />
<br />
<strong>Savers shut out</strong><br />
Anyone with cash in savings continues to see their pot eroded by inflation as the rate hits 3%, while average interest rates wallow at less than 1%. The Chancellor failed to address the issue, as well as ignoring industry calls to equalise the cash and equity limits of ISAs in order to boost savings.<br />
<br />
"We're disappointed ISAs parity was overlooked in today's Budget," said Graham Beale, CEO of Nationwide."Parity would make ISAs fairer and simpler to understand, whilst raising the cash ISA limit would benefit pensioners, first time homebuyers and ordinary savers."<br />
<br />
However, one nugget for savers is the Government's decision to consult on allowing parents to switch their Child Trust Fund savings into Junior ISAs (JISA) - a step in the right direction to boost saving for children.<br />
<br />
<strong>Blow for pensions</strong><br />
Between the grand gestures today, the Chancellor slipped in that the Bank of England's controversial quantitative easing programme would remain in place.<br />
<br />
This is a crushing blow for anyone who is nearing retirement, says Nigel Green of the deVere Group: "Further quantitative easing will keep gilt yields down which in turn are highly likely to keep annuity rates, on which future retirement incomes are based, near historic lows.<br />
<br />
"Since it was initiated, QE has already made millions permanently poorer and many thousands more each week will now also receive a reduced retirement income as the programme is extended."<br />
<br />
Green says the move could result in an even greater number of Brits transferring their pension funds out of the UK as they seek to "safeguard their hard-earned money from QE's adverse effects."<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-the-disappointments/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Budget 2013</category><category>chancellor</category><category>news</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator>Hannah Ricci</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T12:55:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: winners and losers</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<div class="photo-block">
	<p class="photo-caption" style="width:284px;float:left;padding-right:10px;">
		<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/fotoflexerphoto-1363792492.jpg" style="height: 189px; width: 284px;" /></p>
</div>
<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
In a speech peppered with the catchphrase "aspiration nation" - the Chancellor said his measures centred on those who work hard and want to get ahead.<br />
<br />
But does his Budget really allow for this as the economy continues to flat-line and the government is forced to backtrack on its growth forecasts?<br />
<br />
<strong>Families - winners</strong><br />
Feeling the pressure to help working families, the Chancellor made a welcome announcement that working parents will receive a contribution from the Government towards the cost of childcare. Working parents will receive 20% - equivalent to the basic rate of tax - of their yearly childcare costs, up to a total of &pound;6,000 per child. He said the move will save a typical working family with two children under 12 up to &pound;2,400 a year.<br />
<br />
Also, leaked this morning was the news that the Chancellor will raise the income tax threshold to &pound;10,000 from April 2014 - a move he said will give 2.4 million people at tax cut of over &pound;200 each a year, as well as lifting two million people out of income tax altogether.<br />
<br />
Yet while both moves are widely welcomed, they do little to counter the austere measures of previous Budgets, explains Clare Francis, editor-in-chief at MoneySupermarket.com:"Giving with one hand may be a positive, but taking away with the other through other tax increases and benefit cuts means that people are no better off.<br />
<br />
"In fact, the cumulative effect of this and previous budget changes, combined with wage stagnation and rising living costs means millions are worse off and an increasing number of families are on the breadline, struggling to make ends meet every month."<br />
<br />
<strong>Savers - losers</strong><br />
While lower interest rates are intended to boost borrowing for business and keep costs down for mortgage customers, the Chancellor brings another Budget devoid of encouragement for savers. Faced with near 0% interest rates and 3% inflation, there is no help for those who need to save for the future, or those that already live on their savings in retirement.<br />
<br />
"Low interest rates are making life ever harder for people reliant on their savings. Their spending power is being reduced and their standard of living eroded on a daily basis," said Simon Rose of Save Our Savers. "The attack on savers is short-sighted and undermines the country's prospects for investment, growth and retirement."<br />
<br />
<strong>First-time buyers - winners</strong><br />
A major headline-grabbing measure to help struggling first-time buyers is the new Help-to-Buy scheme. Made up of two parts, the first commits &pound;1.3bn to shared equity loans that enable first-time buyers to borrow up to 20% of the value of a new build home towards a deposit, providing they can contribute 5% themselves. The loans will be interest free for five years and be repayable on house sale. The scheme will cover all new properties up to &pound;600,000 in value - around 90% of all new homes in the UK.<br />
<br />
The second is a Mortgage Guarantee for lenders, intended to help all families who are struggling with deposits. The scheme will make &pound;130bn worth of mortgages available from 2014 and enable lenders to offer loans at higher-to-loan value, which will Mr Osborne said will "dramatically increase" the availability of mortgages. The guarantee will run for three years and apply to bold old and new property.<br />
<br />
Stephen Noakes, Mortgage Director at Lloyds Banking Group, commented: "We are very supportive of innovation in the housing market and believe that the mortgage guarantee scheme, will give a much needed boost to the housing market and most importantly address the issue of accessibility.<br />
<br />
"Crucially, this scheme will not only help first time buyers but also second steppers, a key segment of the housing market that is also in need of more support and attention. Whilst the property market is likely to continue to be challenging, the fresh support announced today will have a real knock on effect across the whole of the housing market and we expect it could help around 50,000 people a year."<br />
<br />
<strong>The Big Four - losers</strong><br />
Payment of taxes is the "glue that holds the economy together" the Chancellor said as he reaffirmed his commitment to crackdown on evasion and the professional services that advise on it.<br />
<br />
"With more measures to rein in Corporate Tax avoiders, the Chancellor has sent a clear message that aggressive avoidance is no longer acceptable," said Martin Hook, Managing Director of research and development tax specialists, Alma Consulting Group. "This will have a significant impact on the Big 4 and other firms who market tax avoidance schemes and will need to consider the morality of the schemes that they sell and the spirit of the tax legislation."<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="571" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-high-earners.jpg" style="float:right;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="490" /></a></p>
<br />
<strong>Small businesses - winners</strong><br />
Stating his commitment to helping entrepreneurs get ahead and recognising that the cost of employing people is a huge burden to small firms, the Chancellor announced a surprise move with National Insurance relief of &pound;2,000. Called the Employment Allowance, he said the new measure means than 450,000 small businesses - which account for one third of all companies in the UK - can employ one person earning &pound;22,000 or four people earning the minimum wage, without paying National Insurance.<br />
<br />
"The Employment Allowance will certainly be a massive boon for small businesses. Not least because most weren't really expecting it," said Jonathan Elliott, managing director of MakeItCheaper.com. "Put it another way, a &pound;2,000 saving for a typical small business is the equivalent of cutting their annual energy bill in half or putting 1,250 litres of free fuel in its fleet of vehicles."<br />
<br />
Yet the Government fell short on support for new enterprises, explains John Williams from Kuber: "Noticeably absent from the Chancellor's speech was any news of extending or enhancing the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS). Many were hoping to see the Government offer more help to start-up companies looking for second round finances, but nothing materialised."<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<strong style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">More stories</strong>
<ul style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 40px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">
	<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; list-style: disc;">
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer;">Budget 2013: Five biggest surprises</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; list-style: disc;">
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer;">W</a><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/">hat the Budget means for you</a></li>
	<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; list-style: disc;">
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-families/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer;">What the Budget means for families</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="1457" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budgethow-it-affects-you-1363795103.jpg" style="float:none;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511664/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Budget 2013</category><category>chancellor</category><category>family</category><category>george osborne</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator>Hannah Ricci</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T12:00:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: Is this the solution for the property market?</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><div class="photo-block">
	<p class="photo-caption" style="width:284px;float:left;padding-right:10px;">
		<img alt="Osborne Close" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/pa-16083068.jpg" style="height: 189px; width: 284px;" /></p>
</div>
George Osborne made some fairly bold statements about his new initiative on housing. He announced: "Help to Buy is a dramatic intervention to get our housing market moving," adding that one major piece of the policy had "not been seen before in this country."<br />
<br />
It all sounds very thrilling, but will it make the slightest bit of difference to those trying to buy and sell at the moment?<br />
<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
<h4>
	The plan</h4>
Osborne highlighted that a major part of the problem with the market at the moment is that: "The deposits demanded for a mortgage these days have put home ownership beyond the great majority who cannot turn to their parents for a contribution."<br />
<br />
His solution comes in two parts. First, is that the government will plough &pound;3.5 billion over the next three years into shared equity loans. The idea is that if you want to buy a new-build and you can find a 5% deposit, the government will lend you another 20%. This loan is interest-free for the first five years, and is repayable when the property is sold.<br />
<br />
It's better than existing schemes, because while previous help was only available to first-time-buyers with incomes under &pound;60,000. Now anyone can get one - on any home worth less than &pound;600,000.<br />
<br />
The second part is a new Mortgage Guarantee. It is designed to help anyone buying any kind of property, who has a problem raising a big deposit (subject to responsible lending checks). It will use the government's balance sheet to back these higher loan-to-value mortgages, which Osborne says will "dramatically increase their availability." He says this will free up &pound;130 billion of mortgages. It will be available from start of 2014 - and run for three years.<br />
<br />
<h4>
	How will it affect you?</h4>
If this is successful, it will be a huge boost for those who are itching to buy but cannot find a way to raise the deposit.<br />
<br />
However, the effects will spread wider than that. The idea is that it will free up the blockage on first-time-buyers. This will have an effect across the market. We can expect to see more of these starter-homes selling, allowing second-steppers to move up the ladder, and create movement across the housing market. Anyone who has been struggling to sell in the current climate could find life vastly improves.<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Will it work?</h4>
There are some unequivocal supporters of the policy. Nick Kennett, Director of Financial Services at Post Office said: "The Chancellor's 'Help to Buy' scheme is just what is needed to get the country moving."<br />
<br />
Ian Fletcher, director of policy at the British Property Federation, adds: "This is a strong package of help for housing. Annual transactions are half what they were and that has a knock on consequences for all those parts of the economy that rely on people moving. Helping people needing a deposit has for some time been cited as the missing piece of a coherent housing policy and both is therefore welcome."<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Unsure</h4>
Others are enthusiastic, but warn that the effects will take some time to trickle through. Henry Knight Managing Director of mortgage broker Springtide Capital says: "The long term effect of this scheme on the housing market overall may take some time to manifest itself."<br />
<br />
Other are more sceptical. Jonathan Hopper, managing director, of property search consultants Garrington, says: "Another day, another scheme intended to fire up the property market."<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Weakness</h4>
There are those who question the impact of the loan aspect of the policy. Hopper says: "It's a shame that the 'equity loan' part of the scheme is only available on new-builds. That's perhaps the biggest missed trick. Very few new-build homes are actually being built, and there is still restricted demand for this kind of property anyway, so it's difficult to see how this will have a material impact."<br />
<br />
There are others who remain unconvinced about the loan guarantees. Darryl Flay, CEO of Essential Living, said: "Promises of a 20% equity loan sounds great in principle - but the crunch will come in what mortgage rates look like for customers utilising it. At the end of the day, someone taking out a mortgage with just a 5% deposit will still be viewed as a higher risk than someone with more cash."<br />
<br />
But what do you think? Could you see yourself using these schemes? Let us know in the comments.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="1457" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budgethow-it-affects-you-1363795103.jpg" style="float:none;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a><br />
</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-is-this-the-solution-for-the-property-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>budget 2013</category><category>house prices</category><category>loans</category><category>mortgages</category><category>property</category><dc:creator>Sarah Coles</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T11:41:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: Five biggest surprises</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img alt="Waitress carrying beer" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/pa-6814632beer.jpg" style="border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; float: left; width: 294px; height: 196px; " /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
When George Osborne stood up to make his Budget 2013 speech this morning, few people were expecting him to admit that the economy is now expected to grow by just 0.6% this year, half the 1.2% he predicted at the end of last year.<br />
<br />
However, most people were also surprised to hear that the price of a pint of beer would be coming down by 1p.
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div><br />
Here are five of the biggest surprises from this year's Budget.<br />
<br />
<strong>Cheaper beer </strong><br />
Over the last few years, duty on alcohol of all kinds has gone up automatically by 2% above the rate of inflation, in accordance with a so-called "alcohol duty escalator" introduced by the last Government.<br />
<br />
However, rather than going up, duty on beer is to be cut by 1% later this month, scraping 1p off the price of a pint of beer in many parts of the country. The annual above-inflation rise in duty on beer is also to be scrapped.<br />
<br />
The Government says that its decision has been prompted by falling beer sales and pub closures.<br />
<br />
However, wine drinkers and cocktail fans will still have to pay more for their favourite tipples as all other alcohol duties are to rise by 2% above inflation as expected.<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="215" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-duty.jpg" style="float:right;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p>
<br />
<strong>Lower economic growth</strong><br />
The economy is now expected to grow by just 0.6% this year, not 1.2% as predicted by the Government last year.<br />
<br />
That's an unexpected blow for many Britons, who were hoping that the UK economy was finally looking up.<br />
<br />
The figures for the years to come look a bit more positive, though. Osborne said that growth would hit 1.8% in 2014, 2.3% in 2015 and 2.7% in 2016 and insisted that the UK will avoid a "triple dip" recession despite slower economic growth this year.<br />
<br />
<strong>Equitable Life compensation</strong><br />
While many Equitable Life policyholders are covered by a &pound;1.5 billion redress scheme, those who bought their Equitable Life with-Profits annuity before 1 September 1992 have had little hope of compensation - until now.<br />
<br />
That's because the government has promised ex-gratia payments of &pound;5,000 for people in this group, plus another &pound;5,000 to those in receipt of pension credit.<br />
<br />
Osborne said: "We're not doing this because we're legally obliged to; we're doing it because quite simply it's the right thing to do."<br />
<br />
<strong>Help for first time buyers </strong><br />
First time buyers, and anyone else struggling to buy a property, are to get a boost thanks to a new "Help to Buy" scheme, it was announced today.<br />
<br />
An extension of the FirstBuy scheme aimed exclusively at first time buyers, it will be available to anyone buying a newly built home and will put up &pound;3.5 billion in shared equity loans that can make up 20% of the purchase price.<br />
<br />
Buyers will need a 5% deposit to qualify, but will now be able to buy homes worth up to &pound;600,000 and will pay no interest on the Government loan for the first five years.<br />
<br />
A "Mortgage Guarantee" scheme, which will help those who can't afford a big deposit, was also introduced.<br />
<br />
<strong>&pound;10,000 income tax threshold </strong><br />
The personal income tax allowance, or in other words the amount you can earn tax free before basic-rate 20% income tax kicks in, will be raised to &pound;10,000 in April 2014, Osborne also announced today.<br />
<br />
The fact that this is coming in is no great surprise. The threshold is currently &pound;8,105, rising to &pound;9,440 on April 6, and it was well known that the Government wanted to move it towards the &pound;10,000 figure.<br />
<br />
What is a surprise to many, however, is the fact that it is coming in next year and not a few years down the line as expected.<br />
<br />
The Government claims that 3 million workers will pay no income tax at all from April 2014 as a result of this change.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="1457" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budgethow-it-affects-you-1363795103.jpg" style="float:right;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p>
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>alcohol</category><category>budget 2013</category><category>economy</category><category>news</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator>Jess Bown</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T11:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: What's new for pensioners</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img alt="George Osborne on Downing Street" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/pa-16092513.jpg" style="border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; float: left; width: 294px; height: 196px; " /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
The flat-rate or "single tier" state pension will come in a year earlier than planned, Chancellor George Osborne confirmed today.<br />
<br />
The &pound;144-a-week payments, which the Government claims will prevent working mothers being penalised for taking a break to raise children, will now start in 2016.
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div>
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div><br />
<br />
Pensioners will also benefit from a social care spending cap, designed to protect their savings above &pound;72,000, from the same year. Here, we explain how these changes will affect you.<br />
<br />
<strong>Flat-rate state pensions </strong><br />
In today's Budget, Osborne confirmed the flat-rate state pension of &pound;144 per week will begin in 2016, ending contracting out of defined benefit schemes.<br />
<br />
Under the planned pensions transformation, all Britons of state pension age will get a 'flat-rate' pension worth about &pound;144 a week in today's money - as long as they have paid at least 35 years of NICs.<br />
<br />
And the Budget document claims that 90% of those who hit state pension age before 2036 will be better off as a result of the decision to bring this in a year earlier.<br />
<br />
"An individual who is 40 years old when single tier is introduced in 2016 would contribute an extra &pound;6,000 of National Insurance Contributions (NICs) before reaching state pension age in 2043," it said. "But they would gain &pound;24,000 in extra state pension over the course of their retirement."<br />
<br />
Download this helpful guide: <a href="https://www.dianomi.com/click.epl?pn=2310&amp;amp;offer=584022&amp;amp;campaign=4597" target="_blank">10 tips to improving your pension</a>.<br />
<br />
<strong>Social care costs </strong><br />
Osborne also used his Budget speech to confirm that a new &pound;72,000 cap on individual social care costs will now come into effect in 2016, not 2017 as planned.<br />
<br />
"It will be set to protect savings above &pound;72,000, and we'll raise the threshold for the means test on residential care from just over &pound;23,000 to &pound;118,000 that year too," he said.<br />
<br />
This is good news for older people who have saved for retirement, as is the fact that there were no further announcements on private pensions, into which the maximum you can save each year is already set to fall from &pound;50,000 to &pound;40,000.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="1457" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budgethow-it-affects-you-1363795103.jpg" style="float:none;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p>
<br />
<strong style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">More stories</strong><br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-five-biggest-surprises/">Budget 2013: Five biggest surprises</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/beer-cheer-despite-osborne-gloom/">Osborne cuts the price of a pint</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-winners-and-losers/">Who were the winners and losers?</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.retirement.dianomi.com/partner/aol/Annuity_Guide.dml?offer=580426&amp;partner_variant_id=114">Free guide: A guide to retirement income</a></li>
</ul>
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div>
<div id="myEventWatcherDiv" style="display:none;">
</div><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-whats-new-for-pensioners/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Budget 2013</category><category>pensions</category><category>retirement</category><category>Savings</category><dc:creator>Jess Bown</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T11:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Help-to-buy scheme for house buyers</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2012/09/fotoflexerphoto-1346950918.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
First-time home buyers were given good news as the Government outlined plans to breathe life into the ailing housing market and boost the construction industry.<br />
<br />
A new help-to-buy scheme for those struggling to find mortgage deposits will include &pound;3.5 billion for shared equity loans, and a Government interest-free loan worth 20% of the value of a new-build house.<script>
	function appendskimLinks()
	{
		var sScript = document.createElement('script');
		sScript.src="http://s.skimresources.com/js/23150X859353.skimlinks.js";
		document.head.appendChild(sScript);
        }
	appendskimLinks();
</script><br />
The Chancellor said the scheme will be available to everyone who wants to buy a home from next year.<br />
<br />
A new mortgage guarantee, sufficient to support &pound;130 billion of loans, will help people who cannot afford a big deposit.<br />
<br />
The Government will also offer interest-free loans for five years for those wanting to buy new-build homes.<br />
<br />
The loans will be available to those who can find a 5% deposit with the loan worth up to 20% of the value of a home worth up to &pound;600,000 and repayable when it is sold.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/help-to-buy-scheme-for-house-buyers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>mortgages</category><category>news</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T11:19:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 2013: Motorists get a breather</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/pa-3450482.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 189px; width: 284px; float: left;" /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
UK motorists have been delivered a boost. George Osborne has scrapped September's fuel duty hike. For a car such as a Vauxhall Astra or Ford Focus, Osborne claims, that will be worth around &pound;7 every time the tank is filled.<br />
<br />
However Capital Economics claims that this will likely cost the Treasury &pound;0.7bn. What about other good news for drivers?<h4>
	<br />
	Break for UK drivers</h4>
Osborne claims there will also be new tax incentives for ultra low emission vehicles, though details are scant currently. The AA claims had Osborne had gone ahead with the hike it would have lifted the cost of a 70-litre Ford Mondeo tank of petrol from &pound;97.12 to &pound;99.64 (based on the current average UK petrol price of 138.74p a litre). So some relief for British motorists.<br />
<br />
The move also mean that the Government has frozen every scheduled fuel duty rise scheduled since 2010. The cancellation of the 3p increase on litre of petrol and diesel means the cut will be retained at 57.95p until at least the autumn of 2014.<br />
<br />
<h4>
	Not enough?</h4>
"This was a cost of living Budget," said Harlow MP Robert Halfon. "It has put fuel in the tank of the British economy. I'm glad that the Chancellor has listened again, and helped the millions of car-owners and businesses who are struggling to fill up their family car. Fuel duty is a toxic tax. It hits the poorest Brits the hardest. We have to keep petrol and diesel prices down."<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.fairfueluk.com" target="_blank">UK Fair Fuel</a> campaign welcomed the move. "It is a sign that the Government is listening, but there will be widespread disappointment that the cancellation of this duty rise gives them no immediate relief from climbing fuel prices. Cancelling a rise that really shouldn't happen is not enough."<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="215" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-duty.jpg" style="float:right;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p>
<br />
<h4>
	Company car changes</h4>
"The Government," added Fair Fuel campaigner Quentin Wilson, "needs to cut duty substantially to get the economic growth we all need."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.greenflag.com" target="_blank">Green Flag</a> said that while "the cost of motoring is a constant concern, it will be a relief to millions of motorists that there is some respite against the escalating financial burden of owning and running a car."<br />
<br />
For company car drivers, Osborne is introducing two new benefit-in-kind bands. One will be for ultra-low emission vehicles in a 0-50g/km CO2 band; the second band will go from 51-75g/km CO2. This means a 5% band for 2015/16 and 9% for the higher band. Following years will see further rises.<br />
<br />
<br />
<em>Treasury fuel duty receipts - financial years - AA figures</em><br />
<br />
2011/12 - &pound;26.80bn from 50.60 billion litres of fuel<br />
2010/11 - &pound;27.26bn from 51.70 billion litres of fuel<br />
2009/10 - &pound;26.20bn from 52.83 billion litres of fuel<br />
2008/9 - &pound;24.62bn from 54.15 billion litres of fuel<br />
2007/8 - &pound;24.91bn from 56.17 billion litres of fuel<br />
1997/8 - &pound;19.46bn from 57.59 billion litres of fuel<br />
1991/2 - &pound;10.99bn from 63.40 billion litres of fuel<br />
<br />
<h3>
	<a href="" style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;" target="_blank"><img height="378" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-taxspend-2.jpg" style="float:none;border:0px solid #000000" width="490" /></a></h3>
<br />
&nbsp;<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-motorists-get-a-breather/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>cars</category><category>diesel</category><category>drivers</category><category>fuel duty</category><category>motoring</category><category>motoring-guide</category><category>motorists</category><category>news</category><category>petrol</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator>Adrian Holliday</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T11:05:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Budget 'for the few' criticised</title><link>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/</guid><comments>http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/category/budget/" rel="tag">The Budget</a></p><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://spshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?height=411&amp;width=570&amp;sid=577&amp;origin=undefined&amp;videoGroupID=151143&amp;relatedNumOfResults=100&amp;relatedMode=2&amp;relatedBottomHeight=60&amp;companionPos=&amp;hasCompanion=false&amp;autoStart=false&amp;colorPallet=%23FFEB00&amp;videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919&amp;shuffle=0&amp;isAP=1"></script><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/n0549401363788882675a.jpg" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px; height: 184px; width: 284px; float: left;" /><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-2013-what-it-means-for-you/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; outline: 0px; color: rgb(25, 134, 213); text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; font-family: helvetica, arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px; text-align: left; ">Budget 2013: What it means for you</a><br />
<br />
Unions and campaign groups have attacked the Chancellor for failing to help workers or pensioners - while one business leader praised the Government for "sticking to its guns."<br />
<br />
Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said: "This is a Budget for the few by the few that attacks the many. Millionaires are days away from getting a &pound;40,000 tax cut from the Tories, but George Osborne is using the Budget to attack hard-working public sector workers.<br />
"The worst Chancellor in British history has gone further by giving big business another tax cut while staff caring for the sick get pay cuts. This Chancellor's idea of aspiration is a warped one. Nurses, police and public servants take a pay hit, while corporations and millionaires are allowed to duck their tax duties to the nation."<br />
<br />
John Longworth, director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, said: "While there is much for business to welcome in the Chancellor's statement, such as reviewing the MPC's remit, scrapping the rise on fuel duty, and putting &pound;3.5 billion into helping buyers afford new homes, he and his Cabinet colleagues should have gone further to support enterprise and growth, such as scrapping damaging increases in business rates. We are at an unprecedented moment in economic history, and the Government should be doing everything in its power to get the economy moving."<br />
<br />
TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady said: "This Budget is the wrong answer to the wrong question. We face a jobs, growth and living standards crisis, yet today's proposals are small beer that do little more than tinker at the edges."<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="215" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-duty.jpg" style="float:right;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="450" /></a></p>
<br />
Simon Walker, director general of the Institute of Directors, said: "We applaud this Budget. The Chancellor has stuck to his guns and held his nerve - which is exactly what we wanted to see. Deficit reduction is not an optional policy, it is an absolute necessity, and he is right to reject the siren calls to abandon it."<br />
<br />
Dave Prentis, leader of Unison, said of the Chancellor: "He is out of ideas and should be out of a job. His Budget announcement acknowledges that the country is in desperate need of economic stimulus, but his pride is getting in the way of delivering the shot needed."<br />
<br />
John Walker, chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: "The Chancellor has pulled out all the stops with a wide ranging package of measures to support small business. The housing initiative will help reinvigorate the construction sector in which many of our members operate. the National Insurance cut goes beyond what we were asking for and we are pleased to see the scrapping of the 3p fuel duty due in September."<br />
<br />
The National Pensioners Convention said the Budget was less "aspiration nation" and more "aspirin nation" given that it will have left millions of older people with a "severe financial headache" on issues such as pensions and social care.<br />
<br />
Barnardo's chief executive Anne Marie Carrie said: "This Budget has done nothing for the UK's most vulnerable families, and with a further 200,000 children already set to fall into poverty due to recent welfare changes, Barnardo's is concerned that the burden of spending cuts may yet again be borne by Britain's poorest."<br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<p>
	<a href="" target="_self"><img height="571" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/money.aol.co.uk/media/2013/03/budget-high-earners.jpg" style="float:none;border:0 = Transparentpx solid #000000" width="490" /></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/forward/20511635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/03/20/budget-for-the-few-criticised/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>budget 2013</category><category>news</category><category>pensions-guide</category><dc:creator>Press Association</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-03-20T10:58:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>